Monthly Portfolio Statistics
July 31, 2026Market Commentary
Cash Keeps Calm While Markets Want Answers
US Cash Market Commentary
July had a little something for everyone. If you like geopolitical risk, Iran delivered. If you like inflation worries, oil cooperated. If you like rising Treasury yields, the bond market certainly did not disappoint. And if you enjoy watching investors demand less Federal Reserve intervention while simultaneously demanding more Federal Reserve intervention, Chairman Kevin Warsh provided the summer’s most entertaining spectacle.
July was a month that managed to squeeze an entire year of market headlines into thirty-one days. Investors spent the month navigating an ongoing conflict involving Iran, volatile commodity markets, rising Treasury yields, surprisingly resilient economic data, and an FOMC meeting that left a large portion of Wall Street clutching its pearls. The result was another reminder that markets are perfectly comfortable with uncertainty, provided someone else is responsible for it.
For cash investors, however, the story was considerably simpler. Short-term yields remained attractive, money market funds continued to offer compelling income opportunities, and the Federal Reserve once again demonstrated that rate cuts are not distributed simply because certain people want them.
The Economy Refuses To Cooperate
Throughout July, the U.S. economy continued its frustrating habit of not behaving according to the recession forecasts that have been recycled for the better part of three years. Growth moderated but remained positive. Labor markets cooled but did not crack. Inflation moved in the right direction, but not fast enough to convince policymakers that victory had been achieved.
Investors entered the month hoping for clarity and a straightforward economic narrative. Instead they received the usual mixture of conflicting signals, resilient consumers (Figure 1), sticky inflation and economic data that continues to suggest the inflation pressures are slowing, but not nearly as dramatically as some would prefer.
Figure 1: The Economy Continues to Cooporate
Source: Bloomberg, as of July 31, 2026
Kevin Warsh And The Great Forward Guidance Withdrawal
The biggest story of the month was unquestionably the July FOMC meeting and the reaction to Chairman Kevin Warsh. The Federal Reserve left rates unchanged, which surprised absolutely nobody. The surprise came afterward, when markets appeared genuinely shocked that Warsh meant exactly what he has been saying; he will say less, get used to it.
From the moment he accepted the role, Warsh made clear that he intended to reduce the Federal Reserve’s dependence on forward guidance. He argued that the Fed should spend less time telling markets what it might do six months from now and more time evaluating incoming economic data. Somehow, after repeatedly saying this, portions of the market were stunned when he actually did it.
The criticism that followed bordered on theatrical. Commentators complained that Warsh was not being transparent enough. Others argued that he was creating uncertainty. Some seemed offended that they were no longer receiving a detailed roadmap explaining exactly where interest rates would be months into the future. Respectfully, this criticism misses the point.
Warsh is not failing to communicate. He is communicating something investors simply do not want to hear.
A genuinely data-dependent central bank cannot simultaneously promise what policy will be three, six or nine months from now. Economic conditions change. Inflation changes. Labor markets change. Geopolitical risks change. Monetary policy must retain the flexibility to change as well.
Many critics appear to want the Federal Reserve to provide an answer key before the exam has been administered. That may be comforting, but it is not particularly useful monetary policy.
For more than a decade, markets became accustomed to central bankers providing increasingly detailed guidance about future actions. The unintended consequence was that investors gradually stopped analyzing the data themselves and instead focused on interpreting every syllable spoken by central bankers.
Warsh is attempting to reverse that dynamic.
The market’s response has resembled a teenager discovering that Google Maps no longer provides turn-by-turn directions and now expects them to read the signs. Whether investors like the approach or not, he is doing exactly what he promised he would do.
Treasury Yields March Higher
Treasury markets spent much of July adjusting to this reality. 2yr notes 8bps higher, 10yr notes 21bps higher and 30yr bonds 26bps higher.
Longer-dated debt moved higher as investors grappled with lingering inflation concerns, substantial Treasury issuance, elevated fiscal deficits, and the growing realization that inflation pressures would not go quietly… Policy rates may move higher. Yield curves steepened as markets began reassessing the long-term outlook for inflation and economic growth.
The reality is that markets were forced to price a world in which the Federal Reserve is no longer providing extensive advance notice regarding every future policy decision.
For investors who have spent years complaining that markets had become addicted to central bank guidance, July finally offered a glimpse of what recovery might actually look like.
Iran, Oil and Geopolitics Return To Center Stage
Global events remained an important driver of financial markets during the month.
The ongoing conflict involving Iran continued to generate concerns regarding energy supplies, shipping routes and broader geopolitical stability. Every new headline produced fresh predictions regarding oil prices, inflation and global growth. Oil prices remained elevated throughout the month and periodically reignited concerns that energy costs could complicate the inflation outlook just as central banks believed they were making progress.
The good news is that markets have become remarkably resilient. The bad news is that markets have become remarkably resilient, which means investors now require increasingly alarming headlines before reacting. Anyone searching for a quiet summer news cycle was once again disappointed.
What Matters For Cash Investors
Despite the headlines, the environment for cash investors remained constructive.
The money market curve continues to offer attractive yields, liquidity conditions remained healthy, and front-end interest rates stayed elevated. Funding markets functioned smoothly despite increased Treasury bill issuance and periodic market volatility. More importantly, the month reinforced a message that cash investors have benefited from repeatedly over the past year: patience continues to generate income.
Final Thoughts
July reminded investors that uncertainty is not a policy mistake. It is often the natural consequence of an economy that continues to evolve. The Federal Reserve does not know precisely where inflation, growth or employment will be six months from now. Nor does anyone else. Chairman Warsh’s critics appear frustrated that the Fed is no longer pretending otherwise. Markets may continue to complain. Strategists may continue to demand more guidance. Financial television may continue treating every Fed appearance like the season finale of a reality show. Meanwhile, the cash market continues doing what it does best: generating income, preserving liquidity and quietly avoiding most of the drama. That sounds like a pretty good outcome.
Liquidity Fund
Over the month, the Caltrust Liquidity Fund experienced a reduction in assets, while maintaining a conservative risk and liquidity profile. Total AUM fell from $2.754 bln to $2.359 bln, a 14.3% decrease. The yield of the fund rose modestly by 5 basis points to 3.82% month over month, lifted by higher forward rates and fund redemptions. Markets continue to adjust to geopolitical risks, solid underlying growth, stable employment and elevated inflation and curves have steepened on the chance that the Federal Reserve may need to adjust policy to account for these effects, while Credit spreads have been steady for the month. Issuers remain well funded and short end market liquidity remains sound. The market has removed expectations for a cut in 2026 and is currently pricing in a 75% chance of a hike in September, and 36 basis points of hikes in 2026. From an interest rate perspective, the portfolio positioning remained relatively in-line for the month. WAM (weighted average maturity) fell by 4 days to 48 days, and WAL (weighted average life) rose 2 days to 81 days. The Floating rate exposure in the fund rose by 4.65% to around 25.70%, in response to the higher odds of a potential Fed hike. Exposure to Yankee CD’s increased to 31.30%, Commercial Paper exposure rose slightly and exposure to repurchase agreements fell to 20.47%. Higher asset class concentrations were driven by late month redemption activity. Quality exposure to higher rated credits in the fund fell by -1.29%. Overall, fund liquidity levels remained very strong, as daily and weekly liquidity ratio’s remained stable, while 90 day liquidity increased modestly by 3.66% to 61.32%.
Key Statistics
| Portfolio | |
|---|---|
| WAM (Weighted Average Maturity) | 47.61 |
| WAL (Weighted Average Life) | 80.94 |
| Distribution Yield (%) | 3.76 |
| 30 Day SEC Yield (%) | 3.77 |
| 7 Day Yield (%) | 3.79 |
| 7 Day Liquidity | 29.20 |
| 90 Day Liquidity | 61.32 |
| Average Credit Quality (S&P) | A-1 |
| Floating Rate Bonds (%) | 25.68 |
Sector Allocation
Historical Performance (Net%)
Short Term Fund
In July 2026, the Short-Term Fund posted a gross total return of 0.30% with income return contributing 0.34% and price return contributing -0.04%.
Income return was the largest driver of total return. Treasuries were the largest contributor to income return, contributing +0.21%, followed by IG Credit +0.05%, ABS +0.04%, and government related securities +0.04%.
For price return, Treasuries were the largest contributor at -0.03%.
Key Statistics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (yrs) | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.21 |
| Distribution Yield (%) | 3.69 | N/A | - |
| 30 Day SEC Yield (%) | 3.96 | N/A | - |
| Yield to Maturity (%) | 4.11 | N/A | - |
| Spread Duration (yrs) | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.08 |
| OAS (bps) | 6.33 | 10.24 | -3.91 |
| Wal to Worst (yrs) | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.21 |
| Average Credit Quality (Mdy/S&P) | Aa2/AA | Aa2/AA | - |
| Floating Rate Bonds (%) | 4 | 6 | -2 |
Benchmark: BBG Short Term Govt/Corp Index
Sector Allocation
Monthly Total Return Contribution (Gross bps)
Historical Performance (Net %)
Medium Term Fund
In July 2026, the Medium-Term Fund posted a gross total return of 0.04% with income return contributing 0.36% and price return contributing -0.32%
Income return was the largest driver of total return. Treasuries were the largest contributor to income return, contributing +0.24%, followed by IG Credit +0.06%, ABS +0.04%, and government related securities +0.02%.
For price return, Treasuries were the largest contributor at -0.27%.
Short term Treasury yields continued to climb in July as resilient economic data, persistent inflation, and hawkish messaging from the Fed led markets to increasingly price in the potential for policy tightening. With a longer duration profile and more duration risk, the price impact was felt more acutely in the Medium-Term fund.
Key Statistics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (yrs) | 2.12 | 1.82 | 0.30 |
| Distribution Yield (%) | 3.90 | N/A | - |
| 30 Day SEC Yield (%) | 4.36 | N/A | - |
| Yield to Maturity (%) | 4.36 | N/A | - |
| Spread Duration (yrs) | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.01 |
| OAS (bps) | 6.76 | 6.10 | 0.66 |
| Wal to Worst (yrs) | 2.33 | 1.95 | 0.38 |
| Average Credit Quality (Mdy/S&P) | Aa2/AA | Aa2/AA | - |
| Floating Rate Bonds (%) | 4 | 5 | -1 |
Benchmark: ICE BoA Govt/Corp 1-3 yr (ex BBB)
